URycki, D.R.; Kirtane, A.A.; Aronoff, R.; Avila, C.C.; Blackman, R.C.; Carraro, L.; Evrard, O.; Good, S.P.; Hoyos J., D.C.; López-Rodríguez, N.; Mora, D.; Schadewell, Y.; Schilling, O.S. & Ceperley, N.C. (2024): <b>A new flow path: eDNA connecting hydrology and biology</b>. <i>WIREs Water</i> <b>11</b>(6), e1749<br>DOI: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1749" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1749</a>.
Resource Description
Title:
A new flow path: eDNA connecting hydrology and biology
FOR816dw ID:
128
Publication Date:
2024-01-01
License and Usage Rights:
Resource Owner(s):
Individual:
Dawn R. URycki
Contact:
email:
webmaster <at> ssf-hydrology.org
Individual:
Anish A. Kirtane
Contact:
email:
webmaster <at> ssf-hydrology.org
Individual:
Rachel Aronoff
Contact:
email:
webmaster <at> ssf-hydrology.org
Individual:
Colton C. Avila
Contact:
email:
webmaster <at> ssf-hydrology.org
Individual:
Rosetta C. Blackman
Contact:
email:
webmaster <at> ssf-hydrology.org
Individual:
Luca Carraro
Contact:
email:
webmaster <at> ssf-hydrology.org
Individual:
Olivier Evrard
Contact:
email:
webmaster <at> ssf-hydrology.org
Individual:
Stephen P. Good
Contact:
email:
webmaster <at> ssf-hydrology.org
Individual:
Diana C. Hoyos J.
Contact:
email:
webmaster <at> ssf-hydrology.org
Individual:
Nieves López-Rodríguez
Contact:
email:
webmaster <at> ssf-hydrology.org
Individual:
Demetrio Mora
Contact:
email:
webmaster <at> ssf-hydrology.org
Individual:
Yvonne Schadewell
Contact:
email:
yvonne.schadewell <at> uni-due.de
University Duisburg-Essen
Fakultät für Biologie
Aquatic ecosystem research
Universitätsstr. 5
45141 Essen
Germany
Individual:
Oliver S. Schilling
Contact:
email:
webmaster <at> ssf-hydrology.org
Individual:
Natalie C. Ceperley
Contact:
email:
webmaster <at> ssf-hydrology.org
Abstract:
Abstract Environmental DNA (eDNA) has revolutionized ecological research, particularly for biodiversity assessment in various environments, most notably aquatic media. Environmental DNA analysis allows for non-invasive and rapid species detection across multiple taxonomic groups within a single sample, making it especially useful for identifying rare or invasive species. Due to dynamic hydrological processes, eDNA samples from running waters may represent biodiversity from broad contributing areas, which is convenient from a biomonitoring perspective but also challenging, as hydrological knowledge is required for meaningful biological interpretation. Hydrologists could also benefit from eDNA to address unsolved questions, particularly concerning water movement through catchments. While naturally occurring abiotic tracers have advanced our understanding of water age distribution in catchments, for example, current geochemical tracers cannot fully elucidate the timing and flow paths of water through landscapes. Conversely, biological tracers, owing to their immense diversity and interactions with the environment, could offer more detailed information on the sources and flow paths of water to the stream. The informational capacity of eDNA as a tracer, however, is determined by the ability to interpret the complex biological heterogeneity at a study site, which arguably requires both biological and hydrological expertise. As eDNA data has become increasingly available as part of biomonitoring campaigns, we argue that accompanying eDNA surveys with hydrological observations could enhance our understanding of both biological and hydrological processes; we identify opportunities, challenges, and needs for further interdisciplinary collaboration; and we highlight eDNA's potential as a bridge between hydrology and biology, which could foster both domains. This article is categorized under: Science of Water > Hydrological Processes Science of Water > Methods Water and Life > Nature of Freshwater Ecosystems
