FOR 5288: Fast and invisible: Conquering Subsurface Stormflow
through an Interdisciplinary Multi-Site Approach

Abstract:

In many natural landscapes, subsurface stormflow (SSF) is a runoff-producing mechanism which can substantially contribute to the storm hydrograph of a stream. Despite its importance, there is a lack of systematic studies exploring SSF across sites with different land uses and hydrogeological characteristics. Thus, we face limitations to properly conceptualize and parametrize hydrological models. In order to gain a better understanding of the processes governing SSF, multiple SSF-capturing trenches were excavated. The selected trench sites span over different land uses, geology, soils and climates in Germany and Austria. Depending on local boundaries, the trenches were designed with a width of 11–15 m allowing to collect water flowing laterally at depths of up to 1–3 m. Using separate drainage pipes, the trench’s face is divided into an upper and lower flow-capture zone. Combining the measurements of vertically separated SSF outflow with upstream monitored groundwater levels and soil moisture dynamics, allows to estimate flow propagations along the hillslope. Besides the continuous monitoring, these installations were used to measure SSF events triggered by artificial rainfall. In this study we investigated the SSF response at 11 different trench sites under controlled conditions using a large-scale (200 m²) experimental sprinkling system in combination with deuterated water, which served as an artificial tracer. The irrigation was applied at a rate of ca. 16 mm h-1 for about 3 hours. The analysis focuses on trenchflow dynamics (e.g., timing and magnitude of the peak flow, recession curve analysis) and their relationship with changes in soil moisture and groundwater level. The experiments highlighted the vastly different responses between sites; while some trenches remained dry, others were characterized by extremely high subsurface runoff coefficients and short response times.

Abstract:

Summary This study investigates how different tree species influence soil hydrological properties that are relevant for the rainfall–runoff response of a given soil type. We hypothesize that for the same soil type, tree species that differ in rooting system, water consumption and associated soil fauna and soil flora lead to different soil moisture dynamics and lateral flow processes during rainfall and hence to different runoff responses. To test this hypothesis, we compare soil moisture patterns and interflow at different soil depths in a Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst) forest and in a European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) forest during sprinkling experiments on two 6×10m hillslope segments with the same soil type. Spruce with a shallow rooting system and sinkers that remain very shallow on poorly aerated soils and beech with a heart shaped, often deeper rooting system are two of the most important tree species in Central Europe. At each hillslope, volumetric soil water contents were measured in 6min intervals with 48 TDR waveguides during and after sprinkling with intensities of 100mm/h and 60mm/h (for 1h). The waveguides were installed in 12 soil pits, whereby a single soil pit consisted of four 20cm buriable waveguides installed in 10cm, 30cm, 50cm and 70cm soil depth. Surface and shallow interflow at 10 cm soil depth and interflow at soil depths of 30cm and 60cm was automatically recorded. Despite the high rainfall intensities, no surface flow was observed in any of the experiments and only small amounts of shallow interflow were measured. Soil moisture patterns of lateral cross sections during and after the sprinkling reveal how tree species can alter runoff dynamics: under spruce, coinciding with rooting patterns, a water table develops in approximately 30cm soil depth while the soil water content in 50 and 70cm depth remains low. At the beech site, where coarse roots are found in deeper soil horizons, more water is directed towards deeper, already wetter soil horizons, from where the water table raises into the topsoil with high lateral conductivity. Because the higher water content on top of the stagnic layer allows segments of macropores like old root channels to connect earlier under beech, the beech hillslope exhibits a faster runoff response than the spruce hillslope. A lower water table and a higher macro-porosity makes saturation excess overland flow unlikely under beech. With the shallow water table and a lower available soil volume for preferential flow, a site planted with spruce is prone to saturation excess overland flow under natural rainfall conditions with inflow from the top. The results suggest that different tree species can lead to different rainfall–runoff responses at the same soil type. Though the study site showed minimal variation in soil properties, we cannot exclude that some of the differences in runoff processes we observed are caused by factors other than tree species, because only one large hillslope segment in each forest stand was sprinkled.