• Home
• About
  • About the project
  • Approach
  • Study area
  • Subprojects
  • Contact
  • DFG Science TV
  • ECSF virtual field trip
• Staff
• Publications
  • List publications
• Documents and Services
  • General Information
• Data
  • List datasets
  • Category tree
  • Plots of climate datasets
• RESPECT Phase 1
  • About the project
  • Approach
  • Study area
  • Subprojects
  • Staff
  • Contact
  • DFG Science TV
  • General Information
• PAK 823-825(2013-2018)
  • Overall aims
  • Structure
  • Subprojects
  • Staff
  • Counterparts
  • Study area
  • Contact
  • Links
  • News
  • Data agreement
• FOR816/2(2010-2013)
  • Overall aims
  • Structure
  • Subprojects
  • Staff
  • Counterparts
  • Study area
  • Contact
  • Links
  • FOR816 Data user agreement

Plattformdaten

Übersicht

Detailansicht

Conclusion of the control experiment: 
-Spraying with Combo is the most efficient, low cost- and least manpower-requiring treatment. 
-On the other hand, the commonly used concentrations of this herbicide resulted in high mortality rates of all other components of the vegetation.
-Half of the application rate of Combo in combination with cutting reduces the impact on other vegetation dramatically, but is still highly efficient with respect to bracken.
-Black-foil & cutting, or cutting alone proved as the best method for bracken control if herbicides are not allowed and other vegetation should be preserved.

Treatments:
Asulam	with 400g/l active agent: 6l/ha
Glyphosat with 480g/l active agent: 4l/ha
Wilt Pruf with 25% active agent in solution: 6l/ha
Combo (PM) with 240g/l Picloram and Metsulfuron Methyl (60% p/p): 4l/ha
black foil:	6x6m/Plot
transparent foil:	6x6m/Plot
Cutting: only bracken leaves were cut, other vegetation remained in the plots
treatment combinations:
all treatments mentioned above were used in combination with cutting in alternating application

Further information in 
Roos K, Rödel HG & Beck E 2011: Short- and long-term effects of weed control on pastures infested with Pteridium arachnoideum and an attempt to regenerate abandoned pastures in South Ecuador. Weed Research 51: 165-176. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2010.00833.x; 1365-3180

Data of repasturisation experiment with information about the location and treatments of the respective plots

Sketch of the site: different plot colour indicates different plot management
Data tables: treatment codes (a) control, (b) second control, (c) simulation of grazing (2x per year), (d) simulation of grazing (5x per year), (e) high fertilization , (f) low fertilization, (g) simulation of grazing (2x per year) + high fertilization, (h) simulation of grazing (5x per year) + high fertilization

FOR402-Metainformation:

"Basisdatei für Q2, Q3 und Q5: 52Plots zu 2500m², alle Bäume mit BHD>20cm mit Parameter: Art, BHD, Qualitätsansprache sowie waldbaulicher Behandlung; Verjüngungskompartimente mit 12 x 12 m befinden sich im Zentrum jedes Blocks für Bäume mit BHD 5-20 cm"

Original data: FOR402 (Phase 2) ID: 51004; Creator: Günter, Sven (AG: C4-C4, AG Mosandl)
 
This dataset has been migrated from the previous FOR402-Database to the FOR816-Database by the Central Data Management Z1/FOR816.
Please keep in mind that the migration included all avilable metainfomation which were accessible through the FOR402-Database. Nevertheless, it can't be guaranteed that no thematic misinterpretation occured in the data/attribute description.
There has been no further disciplin specfic control. In any case of ambiguity please contact the dataset creator.